Hybrid Lab Network Resources

TOOLBOX

Reading list / References list

TOOLBOX

Reading list / References list

Here you can find an extensive interdisciplinary reference list that includes books and articles on several topics to support different course structures and challenges. The list also includes suggestions of artists, artistic projects and other sources of information that can be useful to promote our and your students’ exploration of several cross-disciplinary subjects.

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY / BIOTECHNOLOGY

Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, L., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2002). Molecular Biology of the Cell (4th editio). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21054/

Dean, A. C. R., & Hinshelwood, C. (1965). Cell division. Nature, 206(4984), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1038/206546a0

Franklin, S. (1995). Romancing the Helix: Nature and Scientific Discovery. In L. Pearce & J. Stacey (Eds.), Romance Revisited (pp. 63–77). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

Haraway, D. (1979). The biological enterprise: sex, mind, and profit from human engineering to sociobiology. Radical History Review, Spec, 206–237. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-1979-20-206

Lander, E. S. (2016). The Heroes of CRISPR. Cell, 164(1–2), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.041

Nicholson, D. J. (2010). Biological atomism and cell theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 41(3), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.07.009

Resende, L. P., Monteiro, A., Brás, R., Lopes, T., & Sunkel, C. E. (2018). Aneuploidy in intestinal stem cells promotes gut dysplasia in Drosophila. Journal of Cell Biology, 217(11), 3930–3946. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201804205

ART & SCIENCE

Artnodes: E-journal on art, science and technology (Vol. 27). (2021). Retrieved from https://artnodes.uoc.edu

Anker, S. (2014). The beginnings and the ends of bio art. Artlink, 34(3), 16.

Anker, S. (2000). Gene Culture: Molecular Metaphor in Visual Art. Leonardo, 33(5), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1162/002409400552856

Berger, E., Mäki- Reinikka, K., O’Reilly, K., & Sederholm, H. (Eds.). (2020). Art as we don’t know it (1st Editio). Tallin, Estonia: Aalto University.

Bullot, N. J., Seeley, W. P., & Davies, S. (2017). Art and Science: A Philosophical Sketch of Their Historical Complexity and Codependence. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 75(4), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12398

Catts, O., & Zurr, I. (2013). Disembodied livestock: The promise of a semi-living utopia. Parallax, 19(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2013.752062
Tactical Biopolitics: Art, Activism, and Technoscience. (2008). In B. Costa & K. Philip (Eds.), Media. Retrieved from http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=11473

Davis, J. (2007). Signs of Life: Bio Art and Beyond (E. Kac, Ed.). Retrieved from https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/signs-life

Etxeberria, D. (2015). META-Life: Biotechnologies, Synthetic Biology, Alife and the Arts META-Life: Biotechnologies, Synthetic Biology, ALife and the Arts edited by Annick Bureaud, Roger F. Malina and Louise

Mackenzie, L. (2019). Zone of Inhibition: relating to the single cell through speculative performance practice. Public, 31(59), 56–59.

Radomska, M. (2016). Uncontainable Life: A Biophilosophy of Bioart. In Uncontainable Life : A Biophilosophy of Bioart. https://doi.org/10.3384/diss.diva-126670

Reichle, I. (2014). Speculative biology in the practices of bioart. Artlink, 34(3), 32–35.

Schnugg, C. (2019). Bring ArtScience Collaborations: Bringing Value to Organizations (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04549-4

Simoniti, V. (2019). The living image in bio-art and in philosophy. Oxford Art Journal, 42(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxartj/kcz007

Sormani, P., Carbone, G., & Gisler, P. (2019). Practicing Art / Science: Experiments in an emerging field (1st Ed.; P. Sormani, G. Carbone, & P. Gisler, Eds.). New York: Routledge.

Stracey, F. (2009). Bio-art: the ethics behind the aesthetics. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 10(7), 496–500. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2699

Tratnik, P. (2017). Maja Smrekar’s Biopolitical Manifesto from a Philosophical Perspective. Monitor ISH, 19(2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.33700/1580-7118.19.2.65-80(2017)

Yetisen, A. K., Davis, J., Coskun, A. F., Church, G. M., & Yun, S. H. (2015). Bioart. Trends in Biotechnology, 33(12), 724–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.011

Zylinska, J. (2009). Bioethics in the Age of New Media. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262240567.001.0001

SOCIAL SCIENCES / HUMANITIES

Tratnik, P. (2020). Anthropocentric and Non-Anthropocentric Perspectives of Proteus Anguinus, Axolotl, Vampyroteuthis Infernalis, and their environmental systems. Phainomena, 29(112–113), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.32022/PHI29.2020.112-113.X

Sullivan, N., & Murray, S. (Eds.). (2009). Somatechnics: Queering the technologisation of Bodies. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Somatechnics-Queering-the-Technologisation-of-Bodies/Murray-Sullivan/p/book/9781138276871

O’Malley, M. A., & Müller-Wille, S. (2010). The cell as nexus: Connections between the history, philosophy and science of cell biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 41(3), 169–171. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.07.005

Mayberry, M., Subramaniam, B., & H. Weasel, L. (Eds.). (2001). Feminist Science Studies (1st ed.). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203614266

Lykke, N. (2000). Are Cyborgs Queer? Biological determinism and feminist theory in the age of new reproductive technologies and reprogenetics. Fourth European Feminist Research Conference, p. 16. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-32269

Hird, M. J. (2009). Biologically Queer. In N. Giffney & M. Noreen Giffney (Eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Queer Theory. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613482

Hird, M. J. (2012). Digesting Difference: Metabolism and the Question of Sexual Difference. Configurations, 20, 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2012.0019

Braidotti, R., & Hlavajova, M. (Eds.). (2018). Posthuman Glossary (1st ed.). Retrieved from https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/posthuman-glossary-9781350030244/

A feminist companion to the posthumanities. (2018). In C. Åsberg & R. Braidotti (Eds.), A Feminist Companion to the Posthumanities. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62140-1

HUMAN ANIMAL RELATIONS

Agnvall, B., Bélteky, J., Katajamaa, R., & Jensen, P. (2018). Is evolution of domestication driven by tameness? A selective review with focus on chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 205(March 2021), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.09.006

Andersen, K., & Bochicchio, L. (2012). The Presence of animals in contemporary art as a sign of cultural change. Forma. Revista D’Humanitats, (6), 12–23.

Andrews, M. (2009). Marcus Coates and Other Animals. Retrieved April 6, 2021, from Picture This Library website: http://www.picture-this.org.uk/library/essays1/2007/marcus-coates-and-other-animals

Baker, S. (2016). The hands of Beuys and Heidegger. In F. Ramos (Ed.), Animals: Documents of contemporary art (pp. 165–167). MIT Press.

Burt, J. (2016). The illumination of the animal kingdom: The role of light and electricity in animal representation. In F. Ramos (Ed.), Documents of Contemporary Art: Animals (pp. 87–90). https://doi.org/10.1163/156853001753644381

Cronin, J. K. (2018). Art for Animals: Visual Culture and Animal Advocacy 1870-1914. The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Dubois, S., Fenwick, N., Ryan, E. A., Baker, L., Baker, S. E., Beausoleil, N. J., … Fraser, D. (2018). Understanding Animal Welfare. Conservation Biology.

Dubois, S., Fenwick, N., Ryan, E. A., Baker, L., Baker, S. E., Beausoleil, N. J., … Fraser, D. (2017). International consensus principles for ethical wildlife control. Conservation Biology, 31(4), 753–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12896

Forti, S. (2016). Oh, Tongue in Documents of Contemporary Art. In F. Ramos (Ed.), Animals: Documents of contemporary art (pp. 76–77). MIT Press.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Companion Species Manifesto; Dogs, People and Significant Otherness. In F. Ramos (Ed.), Animals: Documents of contemporary art (pp. 191–202). MIT Press.

Holmberg, T. (2019). Walking, eating, sleeping. Rhythm analysis of human/dog intimacy. Emotion, Space and Society, 31(September 2018), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2019.03.002

Kelley, M. (2016). The Meaning is Confused Spatially, Framed. In F. Ramos (Ed.), Animals: Documents of contemporary art (pp. 170–174). MIT Press.

Makowska, I. J., & Weary, D. M. (2020). A Good Life for Laboratory Rodents? ILAR Journal, (April). https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilaa001

Nawroth, C., Langbein, J., Coulon, M., Gabor, V., Oesterwind, S., Benz-Schwarzburg, J., & von Borell, E. (2019). Farm animal cognition-linking behavior, welfare and ethics. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6(Feb), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00024

Olsson, A., Würbel, H., & Mench, J. A. (2018). Behaviour. In M. Appleby, A. Olsson, & F. Galindo (Eds.), Animal Welfare (3rd ed.). CAB International.

Palmer, C., & Sandøe, P. (2018). Animal Ethics. In M. Appleby, A. Olsson, & F. Galindo (Eds.), Animal Welfare (3rd ed.). CAB International.

Rault, J. L., Hintze, S., Camerlink, I., & Yee, J. R. (2020). Positive Welfare and the Like: Distinct Views and a Proposed Framework. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7(July), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00370

Semrekar, M. (2017). CyberArts Prix Ars Electronica: K-9_topology. Retrieved April 6, 2021, from https://www.majasmrekar.org/k-9topology-cyberarts-2017-prix-ars-electronica-exhibition

Serpell, J. A. (2019). How happy is your pet? The problem of subjectivity in the assessment of companion animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 28(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.28.1.057

Špinka, M. (2019). Animal agency, animal awareness and animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 28(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.28.1.011

Tomlinson, M. (2019). Measuring ephemera: finding the “qualitative” in Qualitative Behaviour Assessment as a “whole-animal” science of animal welfare. HoST – Journal of History of Science and Technology, 13(2), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.2478/host-2019-0013

Wolfe, C. (2003). In The Shadow of Wittgenstein’s Lion: Language, Ethics, and the Question of the Animal. In C. Wolfe (Ed.), Zoontologies: the question of the animal (pp. 1–58). Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.